2009

We have found 57 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

Adam v. Halifax County Condominium Corporation No. 267 (Small Claims Court of Nova Scotia)

Condominium corporation not entitled to recover legal fees for demand letters (related to an unpaid special assessment)
Jurisdiction:

Chouinard v. Les Habitations Bel-Horizon Inc. ((Cour du Québec (Chambre Civile) District de Terrebonne))

Construction liens discharged
Jurisdiction:

Lexington on the Green Inc. v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1930 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Under Section 112 of Condominium Act, 1998, condominium corporation can terminate agreement to purchase super suite, parking unit and locker unit
Jurisdiction:

McMillan v. Bruce Condominium Corporation No. 6 (Decision of the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal)

Owner must pay for railing.
Jurisdiction:

Dwane v. Bastion Coast Homes Ltd. (Supreme Court of British Columbia)

Purchaser did not receive proper disclosure, therefore entitled to rescind purchase agreement
Jurisdiction:

London Condominium Corporation No. 21 v. Luis Rodrigues (Ontario Supreme Court of Justice)

Is director entitled to be indemnified by condominium corporation?
Jurisdiction:

McFlow Capital Corp. v. Simcoe Condominium Corporation No. 27 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Court orders appointment of administrator.
Jurisdiction:

Ottawa-Carleton Standard Condominium Corporation No. 650 v. Claridge Homes Corp. (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Court claim against Tarion can proceed.
Jurisdiction:

Progressive Homes Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Co. of Canada (British Columbia Court of Appeal)

Insurer not having duty to defend under commercial general liability policies
Jurisdiction:

Kovats v. M.F. Property Management Ltd. (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Owner’s claim against condominium corporation was subject to mandatory mediation and arbitration.
Jurisdiction:

Bigleaf Ventures Ltd. v. Marine Drive Properties Ltd. (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Developer’s disclosure statement contained material fact that was false or misleading.
Jurisdiction:

Strata Plan LMS 3904 v. Commonwealth Insurance Co. (British Columbia Supreme Court)

23/09/13 – Jurisdiction British Columbia Part 27 published on 01/08/09 Court considers the following questions: How many occurrences? How many deductibles? In 2005, the strata corporation discovered that about one-third of the units were being used for marijuana grow-operations.  Damage to the property (as a result of the grow-ops) was close to $500,000.  The corporation’s insurance provided coverage for this type of loss, but was subject to a $50,000 deductible for each occurrence.  The insurer took the position that each grow-op, in each unit, was a separate occurrence, triggering a separate deductible in each case.  The insurer said: “Because a separate deductible applies to each apartment that was the location of a grow-op, and the repair [cost] in respect of each apartment is less than the deductible, the insurers’ position is that there is no indemnity due under the policy.” The strata corporation asserted that all of the grow-ops were part of one overall operat