2005

We have found 36 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corp. No. 359 v. Solmica Chemical International Inc.

Window replacement project did not require owner involvement. (Arbitrator’s decision. Leave to appeal refused.)
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Condominium Corporation No. 949 v. Staib [See Condo Cases Across Canada, Part 13 (February 2006)] (Ontario Superior Court)

Supreme Court of Canada refuses leave to appeal In this case, the Trial Court had declined to enforce a “No Pets” provision in a declaration in circumstances where the condominium corporation was deemed have been aware of the presence of a cat in a unit, but was too slow in taking steps to require the cat’s removal. The decision was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal. The condominium corporation then sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. Leave to appeal was refused by the Supreme Court of Canada in April 2006, with costs awarded to the owner. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 949 v. Staib.pdf
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 949 v. Staib [Ontario Superior Court]

“No pets” provision in declaration not enforced where condominium corporation has been too slow in taking enforcement action
Jurisdiction:

MTCC No. 1385 v. Skyline Executive Properties Inc. (Ontario Court of Appeal) Note: This is an appeal from the Decision sited in Part 8 of Condo Cases Across Canada (November 2004)

Key case related to corporation’s right to recover costs under Section 134(5) of the Condominium Act
Jurisdiction:

Richardson v. Strata Plan LMS2435

Important case about the responsibilities of Condominium Corporations
Jurisdiction:

Sunray Advanced Hotel Management Inc. v. Strata Corp. BCS226 (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Managers claims for termination of Management Agreement
Jurisdiction:

Rogers Cable Communications Inc. v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 53 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Agreement between Condominium Corporation and Rogers not binding
Jurisdiction:

215 Glenridge Avenue Limited Partnership v. Waddington (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

“No pets” provision in declaration held unenforceable
Jurisdiction:

Bahadoor v. York Condominium Corporation No. 82 et al (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Court approves reports of condominium administrator
Jurisdiction:

York Region Condominium Corporation No. 890 v Toronto (City) (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Condominium Corporation appeals issuance of building permit to neighbouring land owner
Jurisdiction:

Chris Kidney v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 571 and 581 et al (Small Claims Court)

Condominium Corporation entitled to recover all reasonable costs related to arrears of common expenses
Jurisdiction:

Eva Osvath v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No.237 et al

Condominium Corporation entitled to costs beyond limits in Small Claims Court rules