Search Results

We have found 169 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

Hakim v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1737 (Ontario Superior Court)

No oppression of owners. Parking provisions reasonably enforced
Jurisdiction:

Durham Condominium Corp. No. 187 v. Morton (Ontario Superior Court)

Court orders removal of dogs. Selective enforcement was justified
Jurisdiction:

Channa v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 429 (Ontario Superior Court)

Court deals with condominium corporation’s collection rights. Owner also ordered to enter into agreement respecting unauthorized modification to common elements
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1272 v. Beach Development (Phase II) Corp. (Ontario Court of Appeal)

Appeal dismissed. Absence of cost-sharing agreement did not constitute oppression
Jurisdiction:

Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 396 v. Burdet etal (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Dispute relating to arrears of common expenses and related lien rights
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1352 v. Newport Beach Development Inc. (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Condominium corporation could pursue ordinary Court claims (in relation to building deficiencies) despite decisions by Tarion. Condominium corporation could also assert ordinary Court claim against Tarion
Jurisdiction:

Nipissing Condominium Corporation No. 24 v. Smrke (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Corporation granted temporary possession of unit in order to remedy unsafe conditions
Jurisdiction:

Simcoe Condominium Corporation No. 60 v. Skeaff (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

In appropriate circumstances, a condominium corporation can be awarded punitive damages on a compliance application
Jurisdiction:

Courthouse Block Inc. v. Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 173 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Owners’ oppression claim dismissed. Condominium corporation attended to required work in a reasonably prompt and professional way