Search Results

We have found 169 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

Lewis v. Cantertrot Investment Ltd.

Class action by condominium purchasers
Jurisdiction:

Citywide Lawn Care Ltd. v. London Condo Corp.

No fundamental breach of snow removal contract
Jurisdiction:

Peel Condominium Corp. No. 33 v. Johnson

Mediation and Arbitration did not apply to dispute about door colour
Jurisdiction:

Atkinson v. TWS Developments Inc.

Purchaser entitled to rescind agreement
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 949 v. Staib [Ontario Superior Court]

“No pets” provision in declaration not enforced where condominium corporation has been too slow in taking enforcement action
Jurisdiction:

MTCC No. 1385 v. Skyline Executive Properties Inc. (Ontario Court of Appeal) Note: This is an appeal from the Decision sited in Part 8 of Condo Cases Across Canada (November 2004)

Key case related to corporation’s right to recover costs under Section 134(5) of the Condominium Act
Jurisdiction:

Rogers Cable Communications Inc. v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 53 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Agreement between Condominium Corporation and Rogers not binding
Jurisdiction:

215 Glenridge Avenue Limited Partnership v. Waddington (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

“No pets” provision in declaration held unenforceable
Jurisdiction:

Bahadoor v. York Condominium Corporation No. 82 et al (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Court approves reports of condominium administrator
Jurisdiction:

York Region Condominium Corporation No. 890 v Toronto (City) (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Condominium Corporation appeals issuance of building permit to neighbouring land owner
Jurisdiction:

Chris Kidney v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 571 and 581 et al (Small Claims Court)

Condominium Corporation entitled to recover all reasonable costs related to arrears of common expenses
Jurisdiction:

Eva Osvath v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No.237 et al

Condominium Corporation entitled to costs beyond limits in Small Claims Court rules