Search Results

We have found 169 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

Bahadoor v. York Condominium Corp. No. 82 (Superior Court) (February 13, 2007)

Administrator discharged and election of new Board confirmed
Jurisdiction:

York Region Condominium Corporation No. 772 v. Lombard Canada Limited (Superior Court)

Contractor’s insurance gave coverage for damage resulting from contractor’s negligence
Jurisdiction:

Rita D'Alessandro v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 43 and Fitzsimmons Realty Services Inc.

If a condominium corporation has no standard unit description, none of the units contain any “improvements”
Jurisdiction:

York Region Vacant Land Condominium Corporation No. 968 v. Schickedanz Brothers Limited (Ontario Court of Appeal)

In a common elements condominium corporation, a common expense sharing formula that allows potls to avoid contributions until they reach a certain level of development is not oppressive or prejudicial
Jurisdiction:

Sauve v. Paglione (Small Claims Court)

Small claims court properly authorized by Condominium Act to order production of records
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 136 vs. Roth

Court refuses to order sale of unit of unruly owner
Jurisdiction:

Little v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 50 (August 15, 2006)

A case about how the reserve fund can be used and about the 2/3 vote required for substantial changes
Jurisdiction:

Niagara North Condominium Corporation No. 125 v. Waddington

After landlord unsuccessful in attempt to enforce “no-pets” provision in declaration, condominium corporation was denied right to bring its own application against tenant
Jurisdiction:

York Region Condominium Corporation No. 968 v. Schickendanz Bros. Ltd.

Clause purporting to delay common expenses not valid
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 949 v. Staib [Ontario Court of Appeal]

“No pets” provision in declaration not enforced where condominium corporation has been too slow in taking enforcement action
Jurisdiction:

Amoah v. York Condominium Corp. No. 42

Corporation’s lien rights confirmed