Part 02 - 01/05/2003

We have found 12 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

HOT TOPIC: BRITISH COLUMBIA DECISIONS RESPECTING THE MEANING OF “SIGNIFICANTLY UNFAIR”

Section 164 of British Columbia’s Strata Property Act says that a court in British Columbia can make an Order to prevent or remedy actions of the Strata Council if those actions are, or may be, “significantly unfair” to an owner or tenant.
Jurisdiction:

Strata Plan LMS 837 v. Abbotsford (City)

Leaky Condo Case: Excessive Delay Prevents Condominium Corporation from Adding a Defendant
Jurisdiction:

Pelletier v. Couture [2003] J.Q. no 3355

Owner Complaining About Noise Failed to Prove Construction Defect
Jurisdiction:

Apartments International Inc. v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1170

Appeal of “hotel use” decision
Jurisdiction:

Summerside v. Le Turnberry, [2003] J.Q. no. 2285

Owner complaint about air infiltration
Jurisdiction:

Condominium Plan No. 8111679 v. Elekes

Owner entitled to keep satellite dish
Jurisdiction:

Reid v. Strata Plan LMS 2503

Actions of Strata Council not “significantly unfair”. Owners permitted to make limited use of patio
Jurisdiction:

Smithers v. York Condominium Corporation No. 60

No By-law Required to Authorize Remuneration for Officers or Agents
Jurisdiction:

East Gate Estates Essex Condominium Corp. No. 2 v. Kimmerly

Owner’s landscaping changes exceeded Board’s authorization, and had to be reversed
Jurisdiction:

Dunn v. Condominium Plan 89PA14638

Condominium Corporation did not follow proper procedures to impose penalty
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 482 v. Christiansen April 3, 2003

An important case about condominium collections: Lien right applies only to unit in default. However, rents from one unit can be applied to arrears from another
Jurisdiction:

Gentis v. Strata Plan VR 368

Actions of Strata Corporation not “significantly unfair”. Owner not entitled to use deck