Part 86 - 01/06/2024

We have found 12 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 169 v. Doherty et al. (Condominium Authority Tribunal) June 14, 2024

Declaration did not permit parking units to be used for storage.
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 202 v. Szabo et al. (Condominium Authority Tribunal) May 30, 2024

Dogs were not in compliance with condominium corporation’s pet rules. Respondents given 60 days to provide additional documentation (which might permit the dogs to remain).
Jurisdiction:

Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2025 v. Hassan (Condominium Authority Tribunal) April 2, 2024

Tribunal orders tenant to stop making unreasonable noise and orders landlord to ensure that the tenant complies.
Jurisdiction:

Toronto Standard Condominium Corp. No. 1899 v. Devlin (Ontario Superior Court) April 8, 2024

Court orders that owner sell and vacate her unit
Jurisdiction:

Stoyanov v. York Condominium Corporation No. 141 et al. (Condominium Authority Tribunal) March 6, 2024

No evidence of smoke migration into the Applicant’s unit
Jurisdiction:

Pachai v. MTCC No. 850 (Ontario Divisional Court) April 8, 2024

Owner entitled to copies of Statement of Claim and Statements of Defence in Court action commenced by condominium corporation.
Jurisdiction:

McGugan v. Ritchie (Condominium Authority Tribunal) April 1, 2024

Water feature did not create unreasonable sound.
Jurisdiction:

MacLellan v. Waterloo South Condominium Corporation No. 22 (Condominium Authority Tribunal) May 21, 2024

Owner responsible for chargebacks related to parking rule violations.
Jurisdiction:

Kassir v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 607 (Condominium Authority Tribunal) March 7, 2024

Condominium corporation ordered to continue, and to increase, efforts to prevent intruder and related disturbances.
Jurisdiction:

Farinha v. White (Condominium Authority Tribunal) April 16, 2024

Respondent owner was not causing unreasonable noise.
Jurisdiction:

Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 165 v. Steele (Condominium Authority Tribunal) April 23, 2024

Condominium corporation’s Rule respecting pets was reasonable. However, the owner was entitled to an accommodation. Dog not required to wear service animal vest.
Jurisdiction:

Aubin v. The Owners: Condominium Plan No 862 2917 (Alberta Court of King’s Bench) March 18, 2024

Appeal allowed. Condominium corporation had acted reasonably in relation to complaints about noise transmission through wall.