British Columbia

We have found 294 items matching your search query.

British Columbia

Jurisdiction:

The Owners, Strata Plan VR360 v. Jauhar (British Columbia Small Claims Court) July 26, 2016

Owner responsible for deductible in relation to water escape damage
Jurisdiction:

Frank v. The Owners Strata Plan LMS 355 (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Installation of roof deck railings was a repair, not a change
Jurisdiction:

Dandurand v. Strata Plan KAS 3558 (B.C. Human Rights Tribunal)

Human Rights Tribunal refuses to dismiss complaint. Smoker might have a right to smoke, because of a disability
Jurisdiction:

The Owners Strata Plan NW 1245 v. Linden (B.C. Supreme Court) April 8, 2016

Residents ordered to comply with by-laws and to pay fines
Jurisdiction:

Norenger Development (Canada) Inc. v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW 3271 (B.C. Court of Appeal)

Order appointing administrator generally cannot avoid voting rights of owners
Jurisdiction:

The Owners, Strata Plan NW 1859 v. Tan (B.C. Small Claims Court)

Owner responsible for water damage to another unit. However, no recovery of legal costs in Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction:

Beckett and Kuan v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW 2603 (B.C. Humans Rights Tribunal)

Human Rights Tribunal dismisses claim for discrimination in relation to second-hand smoke. However, retaliatory fines declared invalid
Jurisdiction:

Terry v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW 309 (B.C. Supreme Court)

Court orders discharge of strata corporation lien because face amount of lien too high
Jurisdiction:

Furlan v. The Owners, Strata Plan BCS3202 (B.C. Supreme Court)

Strata corporation and its manager liable for biking accident on common property
Jurisdiction:

The Owners, Strata Plan NW 1815 v. Aradi (B.C. Supreme Court)

Court enforces “no smoking” by-law
Jurisdiction:

The Owners, Strata Plan VIS4686 v. Craig (B.C. Supreme Court)

Support services properly included as part of common expenses
Jurisdiction:

Chorney v. The Owners, Strata Plan VIS770 (B.C. Supreme Court)

Strata corporation did not act unfairly in its investigation of complaints about second-hand smoke