British Columbia

We have found 294 items matching your search query.

British Columbia

Jurisdiction:

Owners of Strata Plan NW 391 v. Forsberg (Supreme Court of British Columbia)

Owner’s rental of unit contravened corporation’s by-laws
Jurisdiction:

Strata Plan VR 2213 v. Duncan (British Columbia Provincial Court)

Occupants not always tenants. Move-in fee did not apply
Jurisdiction:

Jiwan Dhillon and Co. Inc. v. Gosal (Court of Appeal for British Columbia)

Court of Appeal strikes down order prohibiting owner from standing for election
Jurisdiction:

Weir v. Strata Plan NW 17 (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Strata corporation obligated to act reasonably, but there may be many reasonable alternatives
Jurisdiction:

Economical Mutual Insurance Co. v. Aviva Insurance Co. of Canada (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Strata Corporation’s Liability Insurance did not apply to claim against owner for alleged negligence as “social host”
Jurisdiction:

Oldaker v. Strata Plan VR 1008 (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Owners must pay their share of costs payable by strata corporation
Jurisdiction:

Strata Plan VR 390 v. Harvey (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Strata corporation entitled to special costs against unruly owners
Jurisdiction:

Rogers v. Strata Plan No. PG 37 (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Court refuses to extend administrator’s appointment
Jurisdiction:

Binichakis v. Smitherman (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Owner’s claim for unjust enrichment dismissed
Jurisdiction:

(Re) Strata Plan NW2212 (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Court refuses application to amend strata plan
Jurisdiction:

The Owners, Strata Plan LMS 2940 v. Squamish Whistler Express and Freight (Court of Appeal for British Columbia)

Strata corporation entitled to extension of limitation period The Strata corporation had started a Court action one day after expiry of the two-year limitation period.  The lower Court granted an extension of the limitation period [see Condo Cases across Canada, Part 19, September 2007].  The lower Court’s decision was upheld on appeal.  The Court of Appeal said that Sections 171 and 172 of the Strata Property Act (which require that the strata corporation obtain authorization by resolution passed by a three-quarter vote, before bringing an action) constitute a “statutory impediment” resulting in a postponement of the limitation period pursuant to Section (6)(4)(b) of the Limitations Act.  The Court said that Section 173.1 of the Strata Property Act (which states that any action commenced without complying with Sections 171 and 172 is not void) does not remove the statutory impediment. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS 2940 v. Squamish Whistler Expres
Jurisdiction:

Yang v. The Owners Strata Plan LMS 4084 (Supreme Court of British Columbia)

Expenses allocated in accordance with Strata Property Act. No oppression