2009

We have found 57 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

Peace v. Strata Plan VIS2165 (British Columbia Supreme Court)

No significant unfairness where special levy is based on unit entitlements
Jurisdiction:

Shannon v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1613 (British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal)

Owner entitled to keep window screen
Jurisdiction:

Ottawa-Carleton Standard Condominium Corporation No. 687 v. ING Novex Insurance Co. of Canada (Ontario Court of Appeal)

Replacement of defective standpipe system not covered by property insurance
Jurisdiction:

Wentworth Condominium Corporation 198 vs. McMahon (Ontario Court of Appeal)

Hot tub not an addition, alteration or improvement to common elements
Jurisdiction:

DiSalvo v. Halton Condominium Corporation No. 186 (Ontario Human Rights Tribunal)

Condominium corporation must pay for townhouse entrance ramp
Jurisdiction:

Strata Plan VR386 v. Luttrell (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Owner not entitled to withhold Strata Fees
Jurisdiction:

Schoal Point Strata Council (Office of the Information & Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia)

Video surveillance of common elements only permitted for certain purposes and under certain conditions
Jurisdiction:

Mount Royal Properties Limited v. Condominium Corporation No. 0113054 (Alberta Court of Queen's Bench)

Voting must be based on unit factors The by-laws of the condominium corporation said that, on a show of hands or secret ballot, voting would be on the basis of one vote per unit; but on a poll, voting would be on the basis of unit factors. The Court said that the by-law was in conflict with Section 26(1) of the Condominium Property Act, which requires that all voting be on the basis of unit factors. The provisions of the by-law which were in conflict with the Condominium Property Act were declared to be void and of no effect. Mount Royal Properties Limited v. Condominium Corporation No. 0113054.pdf
Jurisdiction:

Longley Condominium Services Ltd. v. Condominium Corporation No. 7910117 (Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner - Alberta)

Condominium minutes did not breach PIPA
Jurisdiction:

Condominium Corporation No. 012 5331 v. W. De Silva Properties Inc. (Alberta Court of Queen's Bench)

Arbitration under Alberta New Home Warranty Program not stayed as result of simultaneously court claim
Jurisdiction:

Saulnier v. Le Syndicat des Copropri̩taires de Domaine de L'Avenir - Phase I (Cour sup̩rieure du Qu̩bec District de Laval)

Owner not entitled to interior parking space
Jurisdiction:

Nipissing Condominium Corp. No. 4 v. Simard (Ontario Court of Appeal)

No mandatory mediation and arbitration where dispute involves owner AND tenants.