Part 43 - 01/09/2013

We have found 14 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

Elyadrani c. Syndicat des corporpri̩taires SAX IDS - Phase III (Quebec Small Claims Court)

Administrative and legal costs properly charged to owner of unit
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 17 v. Ge (Ontario Superior Court)

Owner in breach of requirement to use unit as single-family dwelling
Jurisdiction:

IRE-YONGE Developers Inc. v. City of Toronto (Ontario Municipal Board)

OMB refuses to approve proposed mix-use building. Four nearby condominium corporations among those opposing the proposed development
Jurisdiction:

Grantham v. The Owners, Strata Plan VIS 4116 (B.C. Provincial Court)

Small claims court does not have jurisdiction to deal with owner’s claim for damages due to strata corporation’s alleged failure to repair or maintain the common property
Jurisdiction:

Canalta Construction Co. v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company (Alberta Queen's Bench)

Developer-Builder’s insurer must defend claim by condominium corporation
Jurisdiction:

GC Capital Inc. v. Condominium Corporation No. 0614475 (Alberta Queen's Bench)

Director of corporate developer might be personally liable to condominium corporation in relation to lease of heating and cooling equipment
Jurisdiction:

Abdoh v. Owners, Strata Plan KAS 2003 (B.C. Supreme Court)

Strata corporation not obligated to enforce by-law where breach is trifling or benign
Jurisdiction:

Condominium Plan No. 0715560 v. Le Beau Developments Inc. (Alberta Queen’s Bench)

Court action respecting building deficiencies stayed pending the results of the arbitration under the National Home Warranty Certificate
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 62 v. Superior Energy Management (Ontario Superior Court)

Although fixed-price contract for gas supply was void, condominium corporation’s resulting claims were out of time (due to expiry of limitation period)
Jurisdiction:

Friman v. Toledo Estates Ltd. (Ontario Small Claims Court)

Condominium corporation failed to meet its obligations to a purchaser with a disability who had requested a handicapped parking space