Part 38 - 01/05/2012

We have found 19 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

HOT TOPIC: ANOTHER COURT HAS ORDERED THE SALE OF A UNIT OWNED BY A DISRUPTIVE OWNER

But this appears to be a first for B.C. Here’s my summary of the case:
Jurisdiction:

9151-8340 Qu̩bec inc. v. Syndicat des copropri̩taires du 2010 de la Montagne (Quebec Court of Appeal)

Owner not permitted to place monthly fees in trust when owner challenging the validity of a common expense increase. The Owner disputed the validity of an increase in monthly fees and asked that her monthly fees be placed into trust pending investigation of the validity of the increase. The Court declined the Owner’s request. 9151-8340 Qu̩bec inc. v. Syndicat des copropri̩taires du 2010 de la Montagne.pdf
Jurisdiction:

Syndicat de copropri̩t̩ Domaine Quatre-Saison, phase II v. Gigu̩re, (Quebec Provincial Court)

Legal costs of Syndicat, for collection of unpaid common expenses, must be reasonable.
Jurisdiction:

Morris v. Condominium Corp. No. 074 0215 (Alberta Master)

Court orders appointment of investigator
Jurisdiction:

1420041 Ontario Inc. v. 1 King West Inc. (Ontario Court of Appeal)

Owners have the right to assert certain types of claims respecting the common elements
Jurisdiction:

Carleton Condominium Corp. No. 396 v. Burdet (Ontario Court of Appeal)

Dispute relating to arrears of common expenses and related lien rights. Appeal dismissed
Jurisdiction:

Syndicat de copropri̩taires Ilot St-Nicolas phase III v. Savard (Quebec Provincial Court)

Owner ordered to pay common expenses, but interest rate reduced and penalty cancelled
Jurisdiction:

Westmoreland County Condominium Corp. No. 29 v. Estabrooks (New Brunswick Court of Appeal)

Owner/developer ordered to complete unit
Jurisdiction:

Toronto Common Element Condominium Corp. No. 1508 v. Stasyna (Ontario Superior Court)

Owners of POTLs ordered to reverse their changes made to the common elements
Jurisdiction:

Condominium Corp. No. 042 5636 v. Chevillard (Alberta Master)

Fines not properly levied by Condominium Corporation. Corporation also not entitled to costs for application to remove dog that had already been removed
Jurisdiction:

Boily v. Carleton Condominium Corp. 145 (Ontario Superior Court)

Condominium corporation ordered to pay owner’s legal costs as a result of corporation’s failure to honour settlement agreement (respecting common element modifications)
Jurisdiction:

Condominium Plan No. 8210034 v. King (Alberta Master)

“Test Case.” Alberta Master sets out general principles respecting the collection rights of Alberta condominium corporations