Part 36 - 01/12/2011

We have found 17 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1272 v. Beach Development (Phase II) Corp. (Ontario Court of Appeal)

Appeal dismissed. Absence of cost-sharing agreement did not constitute oppression
Jurisdiction:

Condominium Corporation No. 0425177 v. Jessamine (Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta - Master in Chambers)

Legal costs related to common expense collections cannot be added to lien. They can only be the subject of an unsecured claim against the owner
Jurisdiction:

The Owners: Condominium Plan No. 872287 v. Callaghan (Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta - Master in Chambers)

Condominium corporation has no right to lien for recovery of “individual obligation”
Jurisdiction:

Armanowski v. Strata Corporation, Strata Plan LMS 2151 (British Columbia Provincial Court)

Owners claims could not be asserted in Provincial (Small Claims) Court
Jurisdiction:

Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 396 v. Burdet etal (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Dispute relating to arrears of common expenses and related lien rights
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1352 v. Newport Beach Development Inc. (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Condominium corporation could pursue ordinary Court claims (in relation to building deficiencies) despite decisions by Tarion. Condominium corporation could also assert ordinary Court claim against Tarion
Jurisdiction:

Hillview Park Condominium Corporation 8120257 v. Exit Realty Fort McMurray (Alberta Provincial Court)

Manager entitled to compensation in lieu of proper notice of termination
Jurisdiction:

Nipissing Condominium Corporation No. 24 v. Smrke (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Corporation granted temporary possession of unit in order to remedy unsafe conditions
Jurisdiction:

Orr / Rainville v MTCC 1056 and Gowlings (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Common element attic improperly converted to living space by original owner. Subsequent owner (purchaser) ordered to reinstate original attic. Purchaser’s lawyer liable for damages flowing from failure to discover illegal conversion of attic. Condominium corporation not liable for failure to disclose in estoppel certificate