Part 17 - 01/02/2007

We have found 11 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

HOT TOPIC: PROXY SOLICITATIONS MUST NOT BE MISLEADING

Here are the summaries:
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 382 v. Jay-M Holdings Ltd. (Ontario Court of Appeal)

Limitation period had not expired
Jurisdiction:

Strata Plan VR 2000 v. Grabarczyk (British Columbia Supreme Court)

Owner in breach of noise by-laws. But fines reduced.
Jurisdiction:

Condominium No. 822 2630 v. Danray Alberta Ltd. (Alberta Court of Appeal)

Court of Appeal finds no breach of fiduciary duties
Jurisdiction:

Condominium Plan 0122336 v. Shivji et al (Provincial Court of Alberta)

Condominium corporation obligation to arrange insurance does not render corporation responsible for deductible
Jurisdiction:

Kluwak v. Pasternak (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Proxy solicitations must not be misleading
Jurisdiction:

Condominium Corporation No. 9813678 v. Statesman Corp. (Alberta Court of Queen's Bench)

No waiver of subrogation against developer unit owner (for steps taken in capacity as a contractor)
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 551 v. Adam (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Owner’s numerous demands not considered oppressive. Owner not required to disclose reasons for requesting information.
Jurisdiction:

Bahadoor v. York Condominium Corporation No. 82 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

Mandate of administrator suspended
Jurisdiction:

Murkute v. Owners Condominium Plan 8210034 (Alberta Court of Appeal)

Condominium Corporation fulfilled its duty as occupier
Jurisdiction:

Sauve v. McKeage (B.C. Supreme Court)

Truck not “stored” on Strata Lot. But No costs awarded to strata corporation because case of “public interest”