Part 16 - 01/11/2006

We have found 14 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

HOT TOPIC: COURTS DO HAVE THE JURISDICTION TO ORDER SECTIONING IN B.C.

Here is the summary:
Jurisdiction:

Murkute v. Owners Condominium Plan 8210034 (Alberta Court of Appeal)

Slip and fall claim dismissed
Jurisdiction:

Rita D'Alessandro v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 43 and Fitzsimmons Realty Services Inc.

If a condominium corporation has no standard unit description, none of the units contain any “improvements”
Jurisdiction:

York Region Vacant Land Condominium Corporation No. 968 v. Schickedanz Brothers Limited (Ontario Court of Appeal)

In a common elements condominium corporation, a common expense sharing formula that allows potls to avoid contributions until they reach a certain level of development is not oppressive or prejudicial
Jurisdiction:

Sauve v. Paglione (Small Claims Court)

Small claims court properly authorized by Condominium Act to order production of records
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 136 vs. Roth

Court refuses to order sale of unit of unruly owner
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 562 v. Froom (Ontario Court of Appeal)

Dispute subject to mandatory mediation and arbitration
Jurisdiction:

Little v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 50 (August 15, 2006)

A case about how the reserve fund can be used and about the 2/3 vote required for substantial changes
Jurisdiction:

Strata Plan KA 1019 v. Keiran

Owner responsible for loss falling within deductible on Strata Corporation’s insurance policy
Jurisdiction:

Hutka v. Aitchison (July 31, 2006)

Current owner entitled to special assessment refund
Jurisdiction:

934859 Alberta Ltd. v. Condominium Corporation No. 031 2180 (July 28, 2006)

Condominium corporation failed to allocate expenses fairly
Jurisdiction:

Baliwalla v. York Condominium Corporation No. 438 (Small Claims Court)

Special assessment too high