Part 13 - 01/02/2006

We have found 11 items matching your search query.

Jurisdiction:

HOT TOPIC: IMPORTANT DECISION RESPECTING LIMITATION PERIODS IN ONTARIO

York Condominium Corporation No. 382 v. Jay-M Holdings Ltd. York Condominium Corporation No. 382 v. Jay-M Holdings Ltd.
Jurisdiction:

York Condominium Corporation No. 382 v. Jay-M Holdings Ltd.

Court rules that fifteen-year ultimate limited period has expired
Jurisdiction:

Strata Plan VIS 4534 v. Seedtree Water Utility Co.

Strata owners jointly liable for judgment against corporation
Jurisdiction:

Niagara North Condominium Corporation No. 125 v. Waddington

After landlord unsuccessful in attempt to enforce “no-pets” provision in declaration, condominium corporation was denied right to bring its own application against tenant
Jurisdiction:

York Region Condominium Corporation No. 968 v. Schickendanz Bros. Ltd.

Clause purporting to delay common expenses not valid
Jurisdiction:

Valana v. Law

Jurisdiction of Small Claims Court in matter involving strata property issues
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 949 v. Staib [Ontario Court of Appeal]

“No pets” provision in declaration not enforced where condominium corporation has been too slow in taking enforcement action
Jurisdiction:

Amoah v. York Condominium Corp. No. 42

Corporation’s lien rights confirmed
Jurisdiction:

Owners: Condominium Plan No. 942 2336 v. Jeremy Chai Professional Corp.

Alleged “brothel” found not to breach corporation by-law
Jurisdiction:

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 949 v. Staib [Ontario Superior Court]

“No pets” provision in declaration not enforced where condominium corporation has been too slow in taking enforcement action
Jurisdiction:

Smithers v. YCC No. 60 [Divisional Court] [Also summarized in Part 2 of Condo Cases Across Canada]

By-law not required for remuneration to officer or agent